Scientific Research and Development. Economics of the Firm Scientific Research and Development. Economics of the Firm Научные исследования и разработки. Экономика фирмы 2306-627X 2587-6287 88992 10.12737/2306-627X-2024-13-3-34-39 Региональная и отраслевая экономика REGIONAL AND SECTORAL ECONOMY Региональная и отраслевая экономика The Concept of «Embedded Agency» As a Solution to the Problem of Defining Technological Sovereignty in the Context of the Globalisation Crisis Концепция «встроенного агентства» как вариант решения проблемы определения технологического суверенитета в условиях кризиса глобализации Намадов В. Д. Namadov V. D. Российский экономический университет имени Г.В. Плеханова Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 27 09 2024 27 09 2024 13 3 34 39 01 08 2024 02 08 2024 https://naukaru.ru/en/nauka/article/88992/view

В данной научной статье рассматривается концептуализация процессов достижения технологического суверенитета. Подчеркивается роль государства в сохранении контроля над критичными и сквозными технологиями. Конкретизируется значимость технологического суверенитета в условиях кризиса глобалисткого подхода и свободной международной торговли. Автор статьи инициирует концепцию технологического суверенитета с точки зрения «встроенного агентства» и подчеркивает важность взаимозависимости внутренних и внешних технологических процессов. На базе данной концепции предлагается фреймворк дальнейшего стратегического планирования достижения технологического суверенитета.

In this research paper discusses the conceptualization of the processes of achieving technological sovereignty. The role of the state in maintaining control over critical and cross-cutting technologies is emphasized. The significance of technological sovereignty in the crisis of globalist approach and free international trade is concretized. The author of the article initiates the concept of technological sovereignty from the perspective of ‘embedded agency’ and emphasizes the importance of the interdependence of internal and external technological processes. Based on this concept, a framework for further strategic planning for achieving technological sovereignty is proposed.

 технология технологический суверенитет встроенное агентство глобализация инновационная политика глобалистский подход технологическая конкуренция национальная автономия социотехнические системы экономическая устойчивость technology technological sovereignty embedded agency globalization innovation policy globalist approach technological competition national autonomy socio-technical systems economic sustainability

Афанасьев А.А. Технологический суверенитет как научная категория в системе современного знания [Текст] / А.А. Афанасьев // Journal of Economics. — 2022. Т. 12. — № 9. — С. 2377. Afanas'ev A.A. Tehnologicheskiy suverenitet kak nauchnaya kategoriya v sisteme sovremennogo znaniya [Tekst] / A.A. Afanas'ev // Journal of Economics. — 2022. T. 12. — № 9. — S. 2377. Шкодинский С.В. Влияние санкций на технологический суверенитет России [Текст] / С.В. Шкодинский, А.М. Кушнир, И.А. Продченко // Проблемы рыночной экономики. 2022. — Т. 2. — № 1. — С. 75–96. Shkodinskiy S.V. Vliyanie sankciy na tehnologicheskiy suverenitet Rossii [Tekst] / S.V. Shkodinskiy, A.M. Kushnir, I.A. Prodchenko // Problemy rynochnoy ekonomiki. 2022. — T. 2. — № 1. — S. 75–96. Acharya A. After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order // Ethics & international affairs, 2017, v. 31, no. 3, pp. 271–285. Acharya A. After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order // Ethics & international affairs, 2017, v. 31, no. 3, pp. 271–285. Battilana J., D’aunno T. Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency // Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations, 2009, v. 31, p. 58. Battilana J., D’aunno T. Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency // Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations, 2009, v. 31, p. 58. Bauer M., Erixon F. Europe's quest for technology sovereignty: Opportunities and pitfalls. ECIPE Occasional Paper, 2020. no. 02. Bauer M., Erixon F. Europe's quest for technology sovereignty: Opportunities and pitfalls. ECIPE Occasional Paper, 2020. no. 02. Binz C., Truffer B. Global Innovation Systems — A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts // Research policy, 2017, v. 46, no. 7, pp. 12841298. Binz C., Truffer B. Global Innovation Systems — A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts // Research policy, 2017, v. 46, no. 7, pp. 12841298. Crook T.R., Combs J.G. Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains //Journal of operations management, 2007, v. 25, no. 2, pp. 546–555. Crook T.R., Combs J.G. Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains //Journal of operations management, 2007, v. 25, no. 2, pp. 546–555. Edler J. et al. Technology Sovereignty: from demand to concept. Perspectives­Policy Brief, 2020, no. 02. Edler J. et al. Technology Sovereignty: from demand to concept. Perspectives­Policy Brief, 2020, no. 02. Fuenfschilling L., Binz C. Global socio­technical regimes // Research policy. 2018, v. 47, no. 4, pp. 735–749. Fuenfschilling L., Binz C. Global socio­technical regimes // Research policy. 2018, v. 47, no. 4, pp. 735–749. Giddens A. Studies in Social and Political Theory (RLE Social Theory). Routledge, 2014. Giddens A. Studies in Social and Political Theory (RLE Social Theory). Routledge, 2014. Hearson M., Prichard W. China's challenge to international tax rules and the implications for global economic governance // International Affairs, 2018, v. 94, no. 6, pp. 1287–1307. Hearson M., Prichard W. China's challenge to international tax rules and the implications for global economic governance // International Affairs, 2018, v. 94, no. 6, pp. 1287–1307. March C., Schieferdecker I. Technological sovereignty as ability, not autarky // International Studies Review, 2023,v. 25, no. 2, pp. viad012. March C., Schieferdecker I. Technological sovereignty as ability, not autarky // International Studies Review, 2023,v. 25, no. 2, pp. viad012. Porter M.E. Competitive advantage of nations: creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon and Schuster, 2011. Porter M.E. Competitive advantage of nations: creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon and Schuster, 2011. Thornton P.H., Ocasio W. Institutional logics // The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2008, v. 840, no. 2008, pp. 99–128. Thornton P.H., Ocasio W. Institutional logics // The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2008, v. 840, no. 2008, pp. 99–128.