<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20190208//EN"
       "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law</journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law</journal-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn publication-format="print">1991-3222</issn>
   <issn publication-format="online">2587-9995</issn>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11554</article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12737/19209</article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru">
     <subject>ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ, ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСКОЕ, СЕМЕЙНОЕ ПРАВО, МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ЧАСТНОЕ ПРАВО</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en">
     <subject>CIVIL, ENTREPRENEURIAL, FAMILY LAW, PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group>
     <subject>ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ, ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСКОЕ, СЕМЕЙНОЕ ПРАВО, МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ЧАСТНОЕ ПРАВО</subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">PARTICULAR FEATURES OF CONTRACTUAL INHERITANCE OF LEGAL CLAIMS AND OTHER LIABILITIES</article-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Особенности договорного наследования прав требования и иных обязательств</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group content-type="authors">
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <name-alternatives>
      <name xml:lang="ru">
       <surname>Пилипсон</surname>
       <given-names>Эдвард Генрихович</given-names>
      </name>
      <name xml:lang="en">
       <surname>Pilipson</surname>
       <given-names>Edvard Генрихович</given-names>
      </name>
     </name-alternatives>
     <email>e.pilipsons@privattiesibas.lv</email>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group>
   <pub-date publication-format="print" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-05-04T00:00:00+03:00">
    <day>04</day>
    <month>05</month>
    <year>2016</year>
   </pub-date>
   <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-05-04T00:00:00+03:00">
    <day>04</day>
    <month>05</month>
    <year>2016</year>
   </pub-date>
   <volume>2</volume>
   <issue>2</issue>
   <self-uri xlink:href="http://jzsp.ru/articles/article-2426.pdf">http://jzsp.ru/articles/article-2426.pdf</self-uri>
   <abstract xml:lang="ru">
    <p>Договорное наследование прав требований, обязательств в ситуации применения норм международного частного права является достаточно сложной практической задачей. Приоритетная задача в данной ситуации — корректный выбор применимого права. На сегодняшний день наследование движимых вещей, которыми являются права требования, обязательства, происходит согласно правилам коллизионных привязок “lex patriae” и “lex domicilii”, не являющихся корректными в ситуации договорного наследования. В ряде случаев права требования, обязательства приобретают правовой режим “res in transitu”. Представляется необходимым произвести оценку предмета договорного наследования: оно опосредуется инструментами обязательственного права, основой которого является заключенный договор, обладающий встречным имущественным представлением, выраженным в определенной сумме. Поэтому оценка должна быть положена в основу цены договора. При этом оценка должна быть неизменной на протяжении срока действия договора. Так как по действующему законодательству оценка может быть сделана лишь в отношении константного обязательства (например, в случае договора купли-продажи), при договорном наследовании прав требования (цессии) представляется не совсем ясным, как может быть сделана провизорная оценка, когда стоимость обязательства может кардинально меняться в зависимости от обстоятельств в течение промежутка времени.</p>
   </abstract>
   <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
    <p>Contractual succession of legal claims and liabilities in administering rules of private international law is a quite complicated practical problem. The correct choice of the applicable law is the priority in this situation. As of today inheritance of movables, including claims, liabilities takes place according to the connecting factors’ rules “lex patriae” and “lex domicilii” which according to the offered assumption, are not adequate in a situation of the inheritance by contract. It is worth mentioning that in some cases the right to claim, liability acquires legal regime called “res in transitu” which requires special succession regime. Secondly, it is necessary to evaluate the subject matter of the contract. Inheritance by contract is mediated by the tools of the contractual right which is based on the concluded contract with the cross material perquisites evaluated in a certain sum. Due to this circumstance the assessment should be accepted as a basis for the contract price. Since in accordance with the current legislation the assessment can be made solely in relation to a constant liability (for example, in the situation with a contract of purchase), in case of a contractual inheritance of legal claims (cession), it is not clear how provisional assessment can be made, as the cost of liabilities can change drastically depending on circumstances in the course of a certain period of time. This article is devoted to the investigation of these problems.</p>
   </trans-abstract>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
    <kwd>Договорное наследование</kwd>
    <kwd>права требования</kwd>
    <kwd>применимое право.</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
    <kwd>Applicable law</kwd>
    <kwd>claims</kwd>
    <kwd>inheritance by contract</kwd>
    <kwd>liabilities.</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <p></p>
 </body>
 <back>
  <ref-list>
   <ref id="B1">
    <label>1.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beale H. Contract Law (Common Law of Europe). Oxford, 2002.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beale H. Contract Law (Common Law of Europe). Oxford, 2002.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B2">
    <label>2.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blakesley Ch. L. Louisiana Family Law (1992) // Scholarly Works. Paper 841.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blakesley Ch. L. Louisiana Family Law (1992). Scholarly Works. Paper 841.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B3">
    <label>3.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davies J., Rathke S. R. Choice of Law Based on the Seat of the Relationship // Valparaiso University Law Review. 1975. Vol. 1.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davies J., Rathke S. R. Choice of Law Based on the Seat of the Relationship. Valparaiso University Law Review. 1975. Vol. 1.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B4">
    <label>4.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Halson D. Contract Law (Common Law Series). 3rd ed. Butterworths, 2007.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Halson D. Contract Law (Common Law Series). 3rd ed. Butterworths, 2007.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B5">
    <label>5.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Palermo J. S. Donations À Cause de Mort: A Civilian Solution to Characterization of Gratuitous Transfers that Elude Donative Classification</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Palermo J. S. Donations À Cause de Mort: A Civilian Solution to Characterization of Gratuitous Transfers that Elude Donative Classification</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B6">
    <label>6.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Under the Louisiana Civil Code // Louisiana Law Review. 1977. Vol. 37.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Under the Louisiana Civil Code. Louisiana Law Review. 1977. Vol. 37.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B7">
    <label>7.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samuel G. Law of Obligations. Cheltenham, 2010.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samuel G. Law of Obligations. Cheltenham, 2010.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B8">
    <label>8.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shulman J. The Parent as (Mere) Educational Trustee: Whose Education Is It, Anyway? // Nebraska Law Review. 2010. Vol. 89.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shulman J. The Parent as (Mere) Educational Trustee: Whose Education Is It, Anyway?. Nebraska Law Review. 2010. Vol. 89.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B9">
    <label>9.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yiannopoulos A. N. Real Rights: Limits of Contractual and Testamentary Freedom // Louisiana Law Review. 1969. Vol. 30.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yiannopoulos A. N. Real Rights: Limits of Contractual and Testamentary Freedom. Louisiana Law Review. 1969. Vol. 30.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B10">
    <label>10.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zimmermann R. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition: the Concept and its Historical Development. Cape Town, 2010.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zimmermann R. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition: the Concept and its Historical Development. Cape Town, 2010.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B11">
    <label>11.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Брагинский М. И., Витрянский В. В. Договорное право: общие положения. М., 1998.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Braginskiy M. I., Vitryanskiy V. V. Dogovornoe pravo: obshchie polozheniya. M., 1998.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B12">
    <label>12.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Деренбург Г. Пандекты. Обязательственное право. М., 1911.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derenburg G. Pandekty. Obyazatel&amp;#180;stvennoe pravo. M., 1911.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B13">
    <label>13.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иоффе О. С. Обязательственное право. М., 1975.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ioffe O. S. Obyazatel&amp;#180;stvennoe pravo. M., 1975.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B14">
    <label>14.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Общая теория права и государства: учебник / под ред. В. В. Лазарева. 2-е изд. М., 1996.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik / pod red. V. V. Lazareva. 2-e izd. M., 1996.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B15">
    <label>15.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Приходько А. И. К вопросу о процессуальном правопреемстве // Закон. 2007. № 4.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prikhod&amp;#180;ko A. I. K voprosu o protsessual&amp;#180;nom pravopreemstve. Zakon. 2007. № 4.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B16">
    <label>16.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Садиков О. Н. Специфика регулирования некоторых гражданских правоотношений // Советское государство и право. 1978. № 3.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sadikov O. N. Spetsifika regulirovaniya nekotorykh grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniy. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1978. № 3.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B17">
    <label>17.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тарнопольская С. В. Процессуальные аспекты реализации прав нового кредитора по уступленным требованиям // Советник юриста. 2010. № 5.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tarnopol&amp;#180;skaya S. V. Protsessual&amp;#180;nye aspekty realizatsii prav novogo kreditora po ustuplennym trebovaniyam. Sovetnik yurista. 2010. № 5.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B18">
    <label>18.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Татаринцева Е. А. Фактическое воспитание как основание возникновения семейных правоотношений // Вестник ТвГУ. Серия «Право». 2014. № 4.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tatarintseva E. A. Fakticheskoe vospitanie kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya semeynykh pravootnosheniy. Vestnik TvGU. Seriya «Pravo». 2014. № 4.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B19">
    <label>19.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Франчози Дж. Институционный курс римского права / пер. с итал.; отв. ред. Л. Л. Кофанов. М., 2004.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Franchozi Dzh. Institutsionnyy kurs rimskogo prava / per. s ital.; otv. red. L. L. Kofanov. M., 2004.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>
