04067nam#a2200493#i#4500001000500000005001700005008004000022020002300062044000900085072002400094080006700118084006700185084006700252084005900319100013300378245006700511260004400578300001200622500088500634510005701519510011601576510010301692510007901795510012201874510004701996510009602043510007002139510007502209510007102284510014002355510012602495510009902621510010702720510008002827510010402907510008103011510005903092510013203151510007203283510007703355510009203432533003303524856001603557184120240420104920.6  20200327d2020####ek#y0engy0150####ca##$a978-5-369-02029-6##$axxu#7$aGeneral. SOC000000##$aЭкономика. Экономические науки. 33##$aОбщая экономическая теория. 65012bbk##$aОбщая экономическая теория. 77112tbk##$aЭкономические теории. 06.032grnti#1$aGrodskiy, Vladimir Sergeevich$aСамарский государственный технический университет00$aEconomics: The End of the "Two Cambridge Disput"$cMonography1#$aMoscow$bPublishing Center RIOR$c2020##$a323 p.##$aThe monograph for the first time comprehensively explores two main areas of modern economics - the mainstream and neoricardianism, which are in the state of the so-called "dispute between the two Cambridges". The theoretical advantages and disadvantages of the directions, as well as specific proposals for their synthesis are shown. The author’s interpretations of many issues of economic theory are presented, aimed at increasing its consistency, logical tenacity and predictability of further development.
Addressed to scientists, graduate students and teachers who specialize in the field of economics.$aretroeconomic theory, the “two Cambridges dispute”, neoricardianism, mainstream economics, positive normative research methodology, marketer, production technology, “sociology” of production, production criterion, “salary” of production$a10.29039/02029-60#$aAbel' E., Bernanke B. Makroekonomika. – M., 2008.0#$aAliprantis K., Braun D., Berkeksho O. Suschestvovanie i optimal'nost' konkurentnogo ravnovesiya. – M., 1995.0#$aAnan'in O.I. Struktura ekonomiko-teoreticheskogo znaniya: Metodologicheskiy analiz. – M., 2005.0#$aBaumol' U. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya i issledovanie operaciy. – M., 1965.0#$aBekker G.S. Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskiy podhod. Izbrannye trudy po ekonomicheskoy teorii. – M., 2003.0#$aBlanshar O. Makroekonomika. – M., 2003.0#$aBlaug M. Metodologiya ekonomicheskoy nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty ob'yasnyayut. – M., 2004.0#$aBrodskiy B.E. Makroekonomika. Prodvinutyy uroven'. – M., 2012.0#$aGil'debrand V. Yadro i ravnovesie v bol'shoy ekonomike. – M., 1986.0#$aNegeshi T. Istoriya ekonomicheskoy teorii: Uchebnik. – M. 1995.0#$aNikiforov A.A., Antipina O.N., Miklashevskaya N.A. Makroekonomika: nauchnye shkoly, koncepcii, ekonomicheskaya politika. – M., 2008.0#$aPanorama ekonomicheskoy mysli konca HH stoletiya. V 2 t. / pod red. D. Grineueya, M. Blini, I. Styuarta. – SPb., 2002.0#$aRobbins L. Istoriya ekonomicheskoy mysli: lekcii v Londonskoy shkole ekonomiki. – M., 2013.0#$aRudakova I.E., Nikiforov A.A. Makroekonomicheskaya teoriya: problemy, versii, polemika. – M., 2013.0#$aSovremennaya ekonomicheskaya mysl' / pod red. S. Vayntrauba. – M., 1981.0#$aStoleryu L. Ravnovesie i ekonomicheskiy rost. Principy makroekonomicheskogo analiza. – M., 1974.0#$aSendler T. Ekonomicheskie koncepcii dlya obschestvennyh nauk. – M., 2006.0#$aHiks D. Teoriya ekonomicheskoy istorii. – M., 2003.0#$aHillman A.L. Gosudarstvo i ekonomicheskaya politika: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya upravleniya: Uchebnoe posobie. – M., 2009.0#$aCheremnyh Yu.N. Mikroekonomika. Prodvinutyy uroven'. – M., 2008.0#$aShumpeter Y.A. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza. V 3 t. – SPb., 2004.0#$aEkonomicheskaya teoriya / pod red. D. Ituella, M. Milgeyta, P. N'yumena. – M., 2004.##$aThere is an electronic copy4#$anaukaru.ru