Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov (Department of Socio-Cultural Design and Development of Territories, Professor)
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The relevance of the presented study is that in the conditions of the ongoing change of technological structures, political, social, technological and economic aspects of society naturally change. In such periods of diverse transformations in society, it is of interest to turn to the rich theoretical and methodological tools for implementing transformations in controlled socio-economic systems. The purpose of the presented study is to consider the possibilities of using the model of dynamic development of the organization by Livehud B. and Glazl F. in modern conditions of changing technological structures in the interests of ensuring the effectiveness of the implementation of the necessary transformations. The scientific novelty of the obtained results lies in the substantiation of the option for resolving the crisis in the fourth phase of the model of organic evolutionary (dynamic) development of the organization by B. Livehud and F. Glazl through the "phase of radical transformation" based on the impulses of development of intra-firm generation without relying on the help of external resources, characteristic of the associative phase of Glazl F. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the fact that the proposed option of the "phase of radical transformation" in the conditions of a saturated market of a post-industrial economy is expected to be more promising than the option of the associative phase of F. Glazl.
possibilities of use, model of dynamic development of the enterprise, Livehud B., Glazl F., modern conditions
1. Adizes I. Organizational Passages — Diagnosing and Treating Lifecycle Problemsof Organizations // Organizational Dynamics. — Summer, 1979.
2. Donella H Meadows; Jorgen Randers; Dennis L Meadows; William W Behrens. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. — 1. — Universe Books, 1972. — 211 s.
3. Fayol, Henri Administration industrielle et générale. — Paris. — Dunod et Pinat. — 1916. — 174 p.
4. Lievegoed, B. Organisaties in ontwikkeling / B. Lievegoed. - Rotterdam: Lemnis-caat, 1969. – 271 p.
5. Rosenberg, Hans. Political and Social Consequences of the Great Depression of 1873-1896 in Central Europe. // The Economic History Review: journal. — Blackwell Publishing, 1943. — Vol. 13, no. 1/2. — P. 58—73.
6. Alehina O.E., Gaponenko A.L. EFFEKTIVNYY METOD KOMANDNOGO VZAIMODEYSTVIYa. // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 2018, №6., s.72-78. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTCFQL
7. Vasilenko L.A. Sociologiya cifrovogo obschestva: monografiya / L.A. Vasilenko, N.N. Mescheryakova; Tomskiy politehnicheskiy universitet. - Tomsk : Izd-vo Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 2021.-226 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UQJHQJ
8. Mudrova E.B., Lepehin N.N., Pavlova E.G. Subkul'tura i effektivnost' raboty podrazdeleniya universiteta. https://www.e-rej.ru/Articles/2019/Mudrova.pdf
9. Glazl, Fridrih. Dinamichnoe razvitie predpriyatiya: Kak predpriyatiya-pionery i byurokratiya mogut stat' effektivnymi / Fridrih Glazl, Bernard Livehud. - Kaluga: Duhovnoe poznanie, 2000. – 251 s.
10. Karl Marks. KAPITAL. Tom I. https://www.esperanto.mv.ru/Marksismo/Kapital1/index.html
11. Kolesnikova L. ISTOChNIKI ENERGII ORGANIZACIONNOY EVOLYuCII I TRANSFORMACII V NAUKOEMKOM BIZNESE. // Energiya edinoy seti - mart – 2012, s.30-36.
12. Kondrat'ev E.V. Modelirovanie koncepcii cheloveka v tradicii sistemno-evolyucionnoy teorii B. Livehuda i F. Glazla. // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2005, №3, s.91-96.
13. Kondrat'ev E.V., Chemezov I.S. POTERYaNNAYa MODEL': SRAVNITEL'NYY ANALIZ OSNOVNYH KONCEPCIY RAZVITIYa PREDPRIYaTIYa. // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Ekonomicheskie nauki. 2013. №1, s.65-79. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XHULET
14. KUZNECOVA E.Yu., PODOLYaK O.O., TAUFIK A. ORGANIZACIONNYE SPOSOBNOSTI KAK RESURS RAZVITIYa SOVREMENNOY ORGANIZACII. // VESTNIK YuZhNO-URAL'SKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYa: EKONOMIKA I MENEDZhMENT. 2020, №3, s.171-179, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/em200318; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NJJPOC
15. Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Tebekin A.V., Horeva A.V. UPRAVLENIE IZMENENIYaMI V ORGANIZACII S ISPOL'ZOVANIEM MODELI "UPRAVLENChESKOGO UChASTIYa" G. LIPPITTA I U. ShMIDTA V EPOHU POSTINDUSTRIAL'NOY EKONOMIKI. // Epomen. Global. 2023. № S34. S. 341-359. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GNUVMA
16. Reznik S.D. Upravlenie izmeneniyami: uchebnik / S.D. Reznik, M.V. Chernikovskaya, I.S. Chemezov. – Penza: PGUAS, 2013. – 384 s.
17. Tebekin A. V. Vzglyady Dzh. K. Gelbreyta na vlast' tehnostruktury i sovremennye realii. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2017. № 4. S. 254–261. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZXKCXB
18. Tebekin A. V. Tektonicheskie sdvigi v sovremennyh vzglyadah na planirovanie raboty korporacii tehnostrukturoy otnositel'no vzglyadov Dzh. K. Gelbreyta. Strategii biznesa. 2017. № 11 (43). S. 20–24. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZTTEWZ
19. Tebekin A.V. Analiz sovremennyh social'no-ekonomicheskih aspektov na osnove modeli zhiznennogo cikla deprivacii Dzh. Devisa / A.V.Tebekin // Zhurnal sociologicheskih issledovaniy. 2018. T. 3. №1. — S. 1-10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVJIRU
20. Tebekin A.V. PROGNOZ OZhIDAEMYH IZMENENIY V SOCIAL'NOEKONOMIChESKIH OTNOShENIYaH V PROCESSE PRODVIZhENIYa OBSchESTVA K NOVYM ETAPAM RAZVITIYa. // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta im. S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2021. № 3 (38). S. 7-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21777/2587-554X-2021-3-7-12; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DRBJQI
21. Tebekin A.V. Tektonicheskie sdvigi v sovremennyh vzglyadah na vlast' tehnostruktury v biznese otnositel'no vzglyadov Dzh. K. Gelbreyta s poziciy ekonomicheskoy teorii. Mir sovremennoy nauki. 2017. № 2 (42). S. 38–43. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZEZNCP
22. Tebekin A.V. Upravlenie strategiey biznesa organizacii na osnove modeli zhiznennogo cikla Dzh. Gardnera. Strategii biznesa. 2018;(5):03-10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XOEFBZ
23. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. PROBLEMY I PERSPEKTIVY RAZVITIYa NIO.2 V RAMKAH ShESTOGO TEHNOLOGIChESKOGO UKLADA. // Noonomika i nooobschestvo. Al'manah trudov INIR im. S.Yu. Vitte. 2022. T. 1. № 2. S. 57-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/2782-618X-2022-1-2-57-75; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QAGMQQ
24. Tebekin A.V., Tebekin P.A., Egorova A.A. PRIMENENIE MODELI "DVIZhUSchIE SILY ROSTA" A. DAUNSA DLYa POVYShENIYa EFFEKTIVNOSTI INSTITUTOV RAZVITIYa NACIONAL'NOY EKONOMIKI. // Zhurnal sociologicheskih issledovaniy. 2021. T. 6. № 2. S. 2-13. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LHWFUP
25. Hammer M., Champi Dzh. Reinzheniring korporacii: Manifest revolyucii v biznese. Per. s angl. — SPb.: Izdatel'stvo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1997. — 332 s.
26. Shirokova, G. V. Zhiznennyy cikl organizacii: empiricheskie issledovaniya i teoreticheskie podhody / G. V. Shirokova // Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta. -2007. - № 3. - S. 85-90. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IAZEBL
27. Energeticheskiy krizis 1973 – 1974 gg. https://aftershock.news/?q=node/380682&full
