employee
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
The Institute of people’s assessors appeared in the People’s Republic of China in 1949. The research features normative acts and other official documents that regulate the development and operation of people’s courts. In China, selecting candidates for people’s assessors is considered a form of embodying the basic values of the socialist legal system. The article analyzes the conceptual foundations of the multi-stage random selection procedure. Its nature indicates a significant expansion of social composition while the democratic principles in the judicial system seem to grow in strength. The innovative nature of the modern people’s court involves some elements of jury trial, which is not typical for China. The Chinese model of people’s participation in the administration of justice is of dual nature. Its legal basis was set up in 2018 by the Law on People’s Assessors. The Chinese experience can be useful for other countries, regardless of their political and ideological foundations. The author raises a question about the possibility of using the Chinese model of the institution of people’s assessors in modern Russia.
People’s Republic of China, people’s assessors, judicial reform, judicial proceedings
1. Landsman S., Zhang J. A tale of two juries: Lay participation comes to Japanese and Chinese courts. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 2008, 25(2): 179-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/P825202219
2. Pissler K. B. Lay judges in China under the new people's assessor’s law: The shaping of a legal institution. Tsinghua China Law Review, 2020, 12(2): 235-257.
3. Antonen A. A. The role of public prosecutors in jury trials: the experience of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China. Legal Science in China and Russia, 2021, (4): 132-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2021.4.132-135
4. Zihui An. Improvement of national legal system of China on the model of reforms legal system of Russia. The development of Russian-Chinese relations: a new international reality: Proc. II Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Victory in World War II, Irkutsk, 21-22 Sep 2015. Irkutsk: BSU, 2016, 9-17. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wbxqtx
5. Zhang Mingying. "Ma Siu Methods" - "Never leave the masses unattended". China Trial Magazine. 19 Jul 2021. (In Chin.) URL: https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210719A02KPM00 (accessed 30 Oct 2023).
6. He Xiaorong. The inner spirit of the Ma Siu Judgment Methods and its historical value. Applicable Law, 2021, (6). (In Chin.) URL: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?biz=MzA4MjY4MzM1NA==&mid=2649867889&idx=1&sn=7d8f9d3839ffee7e00dcbaa7692481f8&chksm=878492c4b0f31bd2fc9b0401f21d08b13f6f2ba9344c9cdc8d82bc64d96b893bd7b95519404c&scene=27 (accessed 30 Oct 2023).
7. Modern Chinese State. Vol. 1. Basic institutions of state power and management, eds. A. V. Vinogradov. Moscow: The Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022, 903. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48647/IFES/2022.22.76.029
8. Troshchinsky P. V. Evolution of the legal system of the People’s Republic of China (1949-2018): historical and legal aspect (with a list of current laws of the People’s Republic of China). Moscow: VKN, 2020, 185. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oqysdx
9. Qiu Q., Yan C. The people’s assessors in China’s legal system: Current legal structure for their duty and its justification. Tsinghua China Law Review, 2019, (12): 171-183.
10. Rudenko V. N. Citizen participation in judiciary in contemporary world. Ekaterinburg: UB RAS, 2011, 644. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qsgwwz
11. Bykov V. M. Current problems of criminal proceedings. Kazan: Poznanie, 2008, 300. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wesktb
12. Danshin A. V. Ma Siu method as a principle of the socialist judicial system with Chinese specifics: history and modern understanding. Lex Russica, 2023, 76(9): 133-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.202.9.133-145
13. Danshin A. V., Kabargina V. A., Kirsanova D. V., Kuptsova O. V., Kostyleva E. D., Lomovskaya A. V., Panchenco V. Yu., Samoilov I. N., Yakovlev A. S. Actual problems of the theory of law and the state: a review of the materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. "III Gorelikov Readings: modern problems of legal science, education and practice", Moscow, April 11, 2023 (Part 2). Siberian journal of anthropology, 2023, 7(2): 151-168. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ufhqgl
14. Balchindorzhieva O. B., Myakhanova A. N., Skiba A. P. Development of the Chinese Legal System: on the issue of combining law and morality. Penitentsiarnaia nauka, 2020, 14(3): 303-309. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764-2020-14-3-303-309
15. Gavrilova A. V. Lay participation in modern slavic states. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2023, 7(1): 74-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2023-7-1-74-79
16. Nepeyvoda N. Justice at your fingertips: China’s experience. Zakon.ru. 2 May 2020. (In Russ.) URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/05/02/pravosudie_na_konchikah_palcev_opyt_knr_83633 (accessed 30.10.2023).
17. Vilkova T. Yu. Participation of citizens in the administartion of justice: interdisciplinary principle of judicial procedure. Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 2017, (6): 202-212. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.79.6.202-212
18. Maryin A. E. Peculiarities of development of court of people's assessors in the Russian Federation in 1991-2004. Istoriia gosudarstva i prava, 2013, (12): 47-50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qchsth
19. Gavrilova A. V. The phenomenon of popular participation in the Soviet model of justice and its continuity in the post-Soviet space. Journal of Russian law, 2020, (9): 106-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2020.110
20. Gavrilova A. V. Public representation and participation of public representatives in legal proceedings. Herald of Omsk university, 2020, 17(2): 17-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(2).17-27
21. Domrachev I. G. Trial by Jury in civil proceedings. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2016, (2): 129-132. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wcmczb
22. le Roux-Kemp A. Lay participation in the adjudication of legal disputes: a legal-historical and comparative analysis focussing on the people's republic of China and its special administrative region Hong Kong. Tsinghua China Law Review, 2019, 11(2): 183-256.
