This article is devoted to the most important issue of ensuring an innovative breakthrough in socio-economic development in the context of the formation of the information society against the background of the deployment of the sixth technological order. Today, humanity is entering a completely new era, characterized by a fundamentally different system of social relations, values and meanings. The transition to a multipolar world model aggravates the competition of developed countries, on the one hand, and weakens the role of the state in the life of society, on the other. Globalization abolishes borders, eliminates inequalities, and at the same time deprives entire peoples of their national, cultural, and linguistic identity, and erases historical memory. Sustainable development - a concept championed by the progressive world community-requires an innovative breakthrough not only on the scale of individual countries, but also on a broader, planetary scale. This article is an attempt to answer the question of whose forces this innovative breakthrough should be achieved. The article deals with one of the most urgent and important problems – the development of a new theoretical and methodological basis for the development of the state system of personnel support for innovative breakthroughs in the context of the deployment of the sixth technological order against the background of the greening of public and, in particular, economic relations. Taking into account the fact that at the present stage of the development of civilization, humanity has come to understand the limited resources of the planet, the world is faced with the inevitability of making strategic decisions related to long-term innovative advanced balanced socio-economic development and aimed at overcoming global problems that threaten the continued existence of man as a biological species. The intensive development of high-tech technologies in the context of entering the sixth technological order accelerates the reduction of the planet's life potential, so it is extremely important to make production as environmentally friendly and economical as possible, to reduce consumption and, consequently, to reduce the rate of depletion of natural resources. It is almost impossible to achieve this without the organization of a proper system of personnel support, so it is extremely important today to determine the role and place of the state in solving this task.
information society, sixth technological order, strategic management, staffing, digital economy
1. Availabke at: https://www.imf.org/
2. Gordeev V.A. Teoreticheskaya ekonomiya: poisk novykh shagov razrabotki i razvitiya [Theoretical economics: search for new steps of development and development]. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal «Teoreticheskaya ekonomika» [Electronic scientific journal "Theoretical Economics"]. 2019, I. 9 (57), pp. 4-10. Available at: http://theoreticaleconomy.ru
3. Indikatory nauki: 2020: statisticheskiy sbornik [Science indicators: 2020: statistical collection]. Nats. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» [Nat. issled. University Higher School of Economics]. Moscow: NIU VShE Publ., 2020.
4. Indikatory obrazovaniya: 2020 [Indicators of education: 2020]. Nats. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» [Nat. issled. University Higher School of Economics]. Moscow: NIU VShE Publ., 2020. 496 p.
5. McKinsey Global Institute. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/
6. Zinov'ev, A.A. Na puti k sverkhobshchestvu [On the way to a super-society]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2000.
7. Available at: https://justudio.ru/
8. Inozemtsev V.L. Sovremennoe postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspektivy [Modern post-industrial society: nature, contradictions, prospects]. Moscow: Logos Publ., 2000.
9. Fridman, M.F. Teoriya global'noy nauchno-obrazovatel'noy politiki informatsionnogo obshchestva: sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz i prognoz [The theory of global scientific and educational policy of the information society: socio-philosophical analysis and forecast]. Moscow: “Pero” Publ., 2015. 448 p.
10. Available at: https://wciom.ru/
11. Available at: https://digital.gov.ru/
12. Available at: https://profstandart.rosmintrud.ru/
13. Available at: https://www.skolkovo.ru/
14. Epshteyn D.B. Tsifrovaya ekonomika i tempy rosta proizvoditel'nosti truda [The digital economy and the rate of growth of labor productivity]. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal «Teoreticheskaya ekonomika» [Electronic scientific journal "Theoretical Economics"]. 2019, I. 9 (57), pp. 50-53. Available at: http://theoreticaleconomy.ru
15. Chen Y. Improving market performance in the digital economy, China Economic Review, Volume 62, August 2020, 101482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101482
16. Kristoffersen E., Blomsma F., Mikalef P., Li J. The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies, Journal of Business Research, Volume 120, November 2020, Pages 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044
17. DufvaT., Dufva M.Grasping the future of the digital society, Futures, Volume 107, March 2019, Pages 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.11.001
18. Lopez-Becerra E. I., Alcon F. Social desirability bias in the environmental economic valuation: An inferred valuation approach, Ecological Economics, Volume 184, June 2021, 106988.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106988
19. Singpai Bodin, Wu Desheng Dash An integrative approach for evaluating the environmental economic efficiency, Energy, Volume 215, Part B, 15 January 2021, 118940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118940
20. Li Xin, Nosheen Safia, Haq Naveed Ul,Gao Xue Value creation during fourth industrial revolution: Use of intellectual capital by most innovative companies of the world, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 163, February 2021, 120479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120479
21. Sobrosa Neto Ruy de Castro, Sobrosa Maia Janayna, Neiva Samara de Silva, Scalia Michael Dillon, Guerra José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osóriode Andrade The fourth industrial revolution and the coronavirus: a new era catalyzed by a virus, Research in Globalization, Volume 2, December 2020, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100024
22. Cowie Paul, Townsend Leanne, Salemink Koen Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution? Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 79, October 2020, Pages 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.042
23. Ahmed Zahoor, Cary Michael, Le Hoang Phong Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: An aggregated and disaggregated investigation Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 86, January 2021, 106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106511
24. Ribeiro, J.D.A., Ladeira, M.B., Faria, A.F.D., Barbosa, M.W. A reference model for science and technology parks strategic performance management: An emerging economy perspective Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Volume 59, January-March 2021, 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101612
25. Hortovanyi Lilla, Szabo Roland Zs, Fuzes Peter Extension of the strategic renewal journey framework: The changing role of middle management Technology in Society, Volume 65, May 2021, 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101540
