POSSIBILITIES OF MODERN IMAGING TECHNIQUES IN DIAGNOSTICS OF OPTIC NERVE DRUSEN (LITERATURE REVIEW)
Rubrics: REVIEW
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
With the introduction and development of new diagnostic techniques, the relevance of drusen of the optic nerve di-agnostics is increasing. Existing imaging techniques alone or in their various combinations cannot allow to confirm optic nerve drusen in all clinical cases. The diagnosis of optic nerve drusen causes some difficulties because of absence of clear diagnostic standards and classification. Since the advent of new ophthalmological methods of structural and topographic visual analysis evaluation, such as spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, Heidelberg retina tomography, videooculography, B-scan ultrasonography of the orbits and optic nerve, fluorescent angiography of the retina, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbits, the diagnostics of optic nerve drusen becomes more informative. In this article we review the main current imaging techniques in the diagnostics of the optic nerve drusen.

Keywords:
optic nerve drusen, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, Heidelberg retina tomography, videooculography, B-scan ultrasonography, fluorescent angiography, computed tomography and magnetic- resonance imaging of the brain and orbits
References

1. .BessmeltsevaOI, VolkovVV, BagrovLV (2000). Drusen of the optic disc [Druzy diska zritel’nogo nerva]. Vestnik oftal’mologii, 116(4), 28-30.

2. ZhaboedovGD, TodorGA, RazumeyIM (1996). Drusen of the optic disc [Druzy diska zritel’nogo nerva]. Oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal, (4), 37-40.

3. IoilevaEE, LinnikLF, ShpakAA (2001). Differential diagnostics of stagnant and pseudostagnant optic nerve caused by drusen [Differentsial’naya diagnostika zastoynogo i psevdozastoynogo diska zritel’nogo nerva, obuslovlennogo druzami]. Oftal’mokhirurgiya, (4), 23-28.

4. IoilevaEE, MarchenkovaTE (2003). Results of treatment of optic nerve atrophy caused by drusen [Rezul’taty lecheniya atrofii zritel’nogo nerva, obuslovlennogo druzami]. Materialy 3-y Evro-Aziatskoy konferentsii po oftal’mokhirurgii, 70.

5. KuraedovAV, GorodnichiyVV (2007). Computer retinotomography (HRT) diagnostics, dynamics, reliability [Komp’yuternaya retinotomografiya (HRT) diagnostika, dinamika, dostovernost’], 122-124.

6. LesselS, Van Dalen DTU (1983) Neuroophtalmology [Neyrooftal’mologiya], 246.

7. Ioileva EE, Krivosheeva MS, Kabanova EA (2016). A method of diagnostics of drusen of the optic disk: Patent 2576810 of the Russian Federation [Sposob diagnostiki druz diska zritel’nogo nerva: Pat. No 2576810 Ros. Federatsiya].

8. Ioileva EE, MarchenkovaTE (2003). The method of differential diagnosis of drusen of the optic nerve and stagnant optic disc: Patent 2203000 of the Russian Federation [Sposob differentsial’noy diagnostiki druz diska zritel’nogo nerva i zastoynogo diska zritel’nogo nerva: Pat. No 2203000 Ros. Federatsiya]

9. TronEZ (1968). Diseases of the optic pathway [Zabolevaniya zritel’nogo puti], 554.

10. SheremetNL, KharlapSI, KiselevaTN (2010).Optic disk nerve drusen. Report 1. Possibilities of diagnostics [Druzy diska zritel’nogo nerva. Soobshchenie 1. Vozmozhnosti diagnostiki]. Vestnik oftal’mologii, (2), 8-11.

11. SheremetNL, KharlapSI, KiselevaTN, KravchukEA (2010). Optic disk nerve drusen. Report 2. The role in etiopathogenesis of optic neuropathy [Druzy diska zritel’nogo nerva. Soobshchenie2. Rol’ v ehtiopatogeneze opticheskoj nejropatii]. Vestnik oftal’mologii, (2), 11-15.

12. ShpakAA (2014). Spectral optical coherence tomography [Spektral’naya opticheskaya kogerentnaya tomografiya], 170.

13. ShpakAA, MalakhanovaMK, ShormazIN (2011). Assessment of stereometric parameters of optic disk and layer of nerve fibers with HRT III device. Report 3. Comparison of error of Heidelberg retinotomography and spectral optical coherence tomography [Otsenka stereometricheskikh parametrov diska zritel’nogo nerva i sloya nervnykh volokon na pribore HRT III. Soobshchenie 3. Sravnenie oshibki metodov geydel’bergskoy retinotomografii i spektral’noy opticheskoy kogerentnoy tomografii]. Vestnik oftal’mologii, (2), 14-17

14. DavisPL, JayWM (2003). Optic nerve head drusen. Semin. Ophthalmol., 18(4), 222-242.

15. FriedmanAH, BeckermanB, GoldDN,WalshJB,GartnerS (1977). Drusen of optic disc. Surv.Ophthalmol., 21(5), 373-390

16. FriedmanAH, HenkindP, GartherS (1975).Drusen of the optic disc. A histopathological study. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. U.K.,95(1), 4-9.

17. KieglerHR (1995). Comparison of functional findings with results of standardized echography of the optic nerve in optic disc drusen. Wien, Kln. Wschr., 107(21), 651-654.

18. LeeAG, ZimmermenMB (2005). Scleral canal size in patients with optic nerve drusen. Am.J.Ophthalmol., (139), 1062-1066

19. MunteanuM, LehaciC (2004). Acute anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in association with optic nerve drusen. Oftalmologia, 48(3), 16-25.

20. MustonenE (1983). Pseudopapilloedema with and without verified optic disc drusen: a clinical analysis. II. Visual fields. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand., (61), 1057-1066.

21. PuckA, TsoMO, FishmanGF (1985). Drusen of the optic nerve associated with retinitis pigmentosa. Arhc. Ophthalmol., (103), 231-234.

22. PurvinV, KingR, KavasakiA, YeeR (2004).Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in eyes with optic disc drusen. Arch. Ophthalmol.,(122), 48-53.

23. RubinsteinK, AliM (1982). Retinal Complication of optic disc drusen. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 66(2), 83-95.

24. SandersTE, GayAJ, NewmanM (1970). Drusen of the optic disk hemorrhagic complications. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Sol., (68), 186-218

Login or Create
* Forgot password?