Russian Federation
The article presents the results of a new stage in the development of the Voronezh Pedagogical School (VPS) associated with the creation of the General Theory of the Living Word (GTLW) at the Voronezh Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Education (VSC RAE). GTLW is positioned as an integral discipline that unites theological, philosophical, philological, pedagogical and, for the first time, biological aspects. In the context of the Year of National Unity, special attention is paid to the discovery of the third (soborny / conciliar) form of the word, which emphasizes the unifying value-moral principle in speech. The metalanguage of GTLW is revealed, including the concepts of parrhesia, kairos and the term “sympheron” (common benefit, general utility) proposed here, which make it possible to differentiate between constructive (construdo) and destructive (destrudo) speech. It is shown how the symbiotic theory of evolution and the theory of free education receive a new ontological integrative substantiation within the framework of GTLW. The role of artificial intelligence in the development of the theory and the prospects for creating an AI assistant “Living Word” as a tool of hybrid pedagogical intelligence are described. The contribution of the Voronezh Pedagogical School to the formation of Russia's technological sovereignty is substantiated.
sociology of culture, General Theory of the Living Word, soborny conciliar form of the word, metalanguage, parrhesia, kairos, sympheron, symbiogenesis, artificial intelligence, “Living Word” AI assistant, technological sovereignty
1. Annushkin V.I., Komarov V.V., Lazarev A.I. Osnovnye principy i zakony zhivogo slova: istoriko-teoreticheskaya sistematizaciya v ramkah Obschey teorii // Zhurnal istoricheskih issledovaniy, 2026. T. 11. № 1. S. 32-50.
2. Arh. Amvrosiy. Zhivoe slovo: [Posobie po gomiletike]. Har'kov, 1892. 105 s.
3. Bahtin M.M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom hudozhestvennom tvorchestve // Literaturno-kriticheskie stat'i. M., 1986. S. 26-90.
4. Bahtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva / Sost. S.G. Bocharov. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 423 s.
5. Bernshteyn S.I. Zvuchaschaya poeticheskaya rech' i ee izuchenie // Poetika. T. 1. L., 1926. S. 41-53.
6. Brendist K. Konstantin Syunnerberg (Erberg) i issledovanie i prepodavanie zhivogo slova i publichnoy rechi v Petrograde-Leningrade. 1918-1932 gg. // Ezhegodnik rukopisnogo otdela Pushkinskogo doma na 2003-2004 gg. SPb., 2007.
7. Ventcel' K.N. Osvobozhdenie rebenka. M., 1906.
8. Ventcel' K.N. Teoriya svobodnogo vospitaniya i ideal'nyy detskiy sad. M., 1923.
9. Voronezhskaya pedagogicheskaya shkola: didakticheskaya rekonstrukciya: kollektivnaya monografiya / Otv. red. A.I. Lazarev. Voronezh: Kvarta, 2018. 342 s.
10. Gumbol'dt fon V.O dvoystvennom chisle // Yazyk i filosofiya kul'tury. M., 1985. S. 382-403.
11. Derrida Zh. Disseminaciya / per. s fr. D. Kralechkina. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2007. 608 s.
12. Zhivov V.M. Registry pis'mennogo yazyka i social'naya stratifikaciya // Istoriya yazyka russkoy pis'mennosti. M., 2017. Tom II. S. 888-898.
13. Zhivov V.M. Cerkovnoslavyanskiy kak uchenyy yazyk // Istoriya yazyka russkoy pis'mennosti. M., 2017. Tom II. S. 874-887.
14. Zhivov V.M., Uspenskiy B.A. Grammatica sub specie theologiae. Preteritnye formy glagola «byti» v russkom yazykovom soznanii XVI–XVIII vekov // Russian Linguistics. M., 1986. V.10. № 3. S. 372: «Mozhno predpolozhit', chto ot Ioanna Ekzarha idet po krayney mere svyaz' oppozicii vremennyh form s protivopostavleniem Boga i tvari: k Bogu otnosyatsya formy imperfekta, k tvari – formy aorista. U Ioanna Ekzarha oppoziciya vremennyh form interpretiruetsya kak protivopostavlenie «vsegdashnego» vremeni i vremeni sobstvenno proshedshego, aoristnogo. U Zinoviya zhe oppoziciya, kak kazhetsya, stroitsya drugim obrazom: k Bogu otnositsya ne tol'ko imperfekt, no i imperfektnyy aorist, obe eti formy protivopostavlyayutsya perfektnomu aoristu, i eto protivopostavlenie interpretiruetsya kak razlichie mezhdu oboznachennym i neoboznachennym nachalom processa: aoristu pripisyvaetsya inhoativnoe znachenie, i imenno poetomu on okazyvaetsya neprilozhim k ne imeyuschemu nachala bozhestvennomu bytiyu. Takim obrazom oppoziciya podvergaetsya pereosmysleniyu <...>. Tam, gde russkie knizhniki govoryat o teh zhe formah, oni pripisyvayut im drugie znacheniya, a tam, gde oni obsuzhdayut te zhe znacheniya, oni sootnosyat ih s raznymi formami».
15. Zhivoe slovo dlya izucheniya rodnogo yazyka. Metodika russkogo yazyka v rasskazah i ob'yasneniyah po literaturnym obrazcam: prakticheskiy kurs dlya 1-go klassa / sost. A.V. Barsov; red. A.A. Hovanskiy. Voronezh, 1889. 91 s.
16. Zalevskaya A.A. Interfeysnaya teoriya znacheniya slova: psiholingvisticheskiy podhod. Tver': Tverskoy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2014. 222 s.
17. Zapiski Instituta zhivogo slova. Petrograd, 1919. S. 4.
18. Karyakin V.V. Gibridnye intellektual'nye sistemy kak simbioz estestvennogo i iskusstvennogo intellektov // Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya, 2022. № 17-1. S. 652–655.
19. Kessler K.F. O zakone vzaimnoy pomoschi // Trudy S.-Peterburgskogo obschestva estestvoispytateley, 1880. T. 11. Vyp. 1. S. 129-131.
20. Kozo-Polyanskiy B.M. Novyy princip biologii: ocherk teorii simbiogeneza. M.; L.: Puchina, 1924. 147 s.
21. Komarov V.V., Lazarev A.I. Zhivoe slovo i ego glubinnye energiynye struktury: integraciya antichnyh, bogoslovskih i psihoanaliticheskih konceptov v metayazyk Obschey teorii zhivogo slova // Zhurnal filologicheskih issledovaniy, 2026. T. 11. № 1. S. 7–25.
22. Kornetov G.B. Stanovlenie i suschnost' peredayuschey, porozhdayuschey i preobrazuyuschey pedagogiki // Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. 2017. № 4. S. 46–57.
23. Krivotulova E.V., Lazarev A.I. Istoki i perspektivy razvitiya Obschey teorii zhivogo slova v kontekste Voronezhskoy pedagogicheskoy shkoly // Zhurnal filologicheskih issledovaniy, 2026. T. 11. № 1. S. 26–36.
24. Kropotkin P.A. Vzaimnaya pomosch' kak faktor evolyucii. S.-Pb.: Tovarischestvo «Znanie», 1907. 351 s.
25. Lazarev A.I. Grammatica sub specie philosophia: vechnost' v filosofii i grammatike // Po sledam zhivogo slova: monogrfiya. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe nasledie «Filologicheskih zapisok» v sovremennom kontekste. M.: Infra-M (Nauchnaya mysl'), 2024. S. 97-113.
26. Lazarev A.I. Ot analiza k proektirovaniyu: metayazyk Obschey teorii zhivogo slova kak funkcional'naya osnova dlya formirovaniya konsentnogo tipa soznaniya i ego algoritmizacii v sistemah II // Zhurnal filologicheskih issledovaniy, 2026. T. 11. № 1. S. 37-63.
27. Merezhkovskiy K.S. Teoriya dvuh plazm kak osnova simbiogenezisa, novogo ucheniya o proishozhdenii organizmov, Kazan', 1909.
28. Platon. Fedr / Polnoe sobranie tvoreniy Platona // Per. S.A. Zhebeleva. – Petrograd, 1922. 182 s.
29. Polovcov V.A. Tri napravleniya v teorii rodnogo yazyka // FZ, 1860. Vyp. 1. S. 19-35.
30. Potebnya A.A. Mysl' i yazyk / Polnoe sobranie trudov // Podgotovka teksta Yu.S. Rasskazova i O.A. Sycheva. Kommentarii Yu.S. Rasskazova. M., 1999. 300 s.
31. Primechatel'no, chto v russkom yazyke net ustoyavshegosya slova dlya oboznacheniya «obschevygodnosti»; est' slovo «obschepoleznyy», no ono imeet utilitarno-funkcional'nyy ottenok (poleznyy dlya mnogih v prakticheskom smysle) i ne peredaet eticheskogo, dinamicheskogo i sobornogo izmereniya, zalozhennogo v simferone, kotoryy aktualiziruetsya v konkretnoy kommunikativnoy situacii, kogda uchastniki dialoga soznatel'no ischut obschevygodnoe reshenie; a «obschevygodnyy» – pochti ne upotreblyaetsya (i ne fiksiruetsya v tolkovyh slovaryah).
32. Protopopova I.A. Logos zoon: Platon i Derrida // Siniy divan, 2008. № 10-11. S. 96-113.
33. Sabaneev L.L. Teoriya intonacii V. Vsevolodskogo-Gerngrossa. Gos. Izd. 1922 g. (113 str.) // Pechat' i revolyuciya, 1923. kn. 1. S. 238-239.
34. Studeneckiy V. Otnoshenie slova k mysli // Filologicheskie zapiski, 1861. Vyp. 4. S. 214-218.
35. Trubachev O.N. V poiskah edinstva: vzglyad filologa na problemu istokov Rusi. M.: Nauka, 2005. 286 s.
36. Ushinskiy K.D. Chelovek kak predmet vospitaniya. Opyt pedagogicheskoy antropologii. SPb., 1869.
37. Famincin A.S. O roli simbioza v evolyucii organizmov // Zapiski Akademii nauk. 8 seriya. Po Fiziko-matematicheskomu otdeleniyu, 1907. T. 20. № 3. 14 s.
38. Fuko M. Rech' i istina. Lekcii o parresii (1982-1983) / per. s fr. D. Kralechkina. M.: Delo RANHiGS, 2020. 384 s.
39. Hovanskiy A.A. Zhivoe slovo i zhivye fakty // Filologicheskie zapiski. Voronezh, 1899. Vyp. I. C. 1-8.
40. Hovanskiy A.A. Chto u nas sdelano na pol'zu izucheniya russkogo yazyka i chto delaetsya? V chem nuzhdaetsya nasha uchebnaya filologicheskaya literatura? // Filologicheskie zapiski, 1860. Vyp. I. S. 7-18.
41. Chapny E.V. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe osmyslenie gibridnogo intellekta // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie», 2025. №. 1. S. 24-37.
42. Chehov N.V. Svobodnaya shkola. Opyt organizacii sredney shkoly novogo tipa. M., 1907.
43. Chehov N.V. Tipy russkoy shkoly v ee istoricheskom razvitii. M., 1923.
44. Margulis L. Origin of eucaryotic cells. New Haven: Yale Univ.press. 1970.
45. Zamprogno G., Tiddi I., & Verheij B. (2025). Autonomous Research Assistants for Hybrid Intelligence: Landscape and Challenges. In R. Petrick, & C. Geib (editors), Proceedings of the 2025 AAAI Spring Symposium Series (1 uitgave, Vol. 5, blz. 350-358). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v5i1.35611
