employee
Nal'chik, Nalchik, Russian Federation
UDC 32
The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the political and administrative mechanisms of the digital transformation of social policy at the regional level, using the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic as a case study, in the context of the implementation of the federal digital agenda and the adaptation of digital solutions to regional institutional and socio-cultural specificities. The author employs a qualitative case study approach aimed at a comprehensive examination of institutional and governance-related features of digitalization in the social sphere within a constituent entity of the Russian Federation. Auxiliary research methods include institutional and political-administrative analysis, content analysis of strategic and programmatic documents at the federal and regional levels, elements of discourse analysis of public speeches by the republican leadership, as well as secondary analysis of statistical data and analytical reports of profile executive authorities for the period 2021–2024. The author advances the hypothesis that the success of the digital transformation of social policy in Russian regions is determined not so much by the formal implementation of federal digital platforms and the achievement of digital maturity indicators, but rather by the capacity of regional governance institutions for institutional adaptation of digital solutions, effective interagency coordination, and consideration of socio-cultural and infrastructural constraints. The study reveals the specific features of normative and institutional design of digital transformation in the social policy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, the characteristics of interagency coordination, and the regional interpretation of federal platform-based solutions, as well as the role of human resources, organizational, and discursive mechanisms in ensuring the inclusivity of digital transformations. It is concluded that the digital transformation of social policy in a multiethnic and territorially heterogeneous region represents a nonlinear political and administrative process, the outcomes of which depend on the configuration of regional institutions and mechanisms of legitimizing digital governance practices. The practical significance of the study lies in the applicability of its findings to the development and adjustment of regional programs for the digital transformation of social policy, while its theoretical significance consists in advancing institutional and political-administrative approaches to the analysis of the digital state, taking into account regional diversity and the federal context.
social policy; digital transformation; political and administrative mechanisms; digital state; institutional adaptation; Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.
1. Abramov V.I., Andreev V.D. Analiz strategii tsifrovoi transformatsii regionov Rossii v kontekste dostizheniya natsional’nykh tselei. [Analysis of Digital Transformation Strategies of Russian Regions in the Context of Achieving National Goals]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues]. 2023, I. 1, pp. 89–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-1-89-119. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JOKUIR
2. Aramisov T.R. Sotsial’noe gosudarstvo v tsifrovuyu epokhu: tsifrovye vozmozhnosti ili tsifrovoe neravenstvo. [The Social State in the Digital Age: Digital Opportunities or Digital Inequality]. Tsifrovaya sotsiologiya [Digital Sociology]. 2025, V. 8, I. 2, pp. 27–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2025-8-2-27-44. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UOKNEO
3. Bolotaeva O.S. Tsifrovizatsiya kak faktor razvitiya sotsial’nogo gosudarstva. [Digitalization as a Factor in the Development of the Social State]. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika [Law and State: Theory and Practice]. 2021, I. 10 (202), pp. 53–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1337_2021_10_53. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JAUFDM
4. Volodenkov S.V. Transformatsiya sovremennykh politicheskikh protsessov v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obshchestva: klyuchevye stsenarii. [Transformation of Contemporary Political Processes in the Context of Societal Digitalization: Key Scenarios]. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, parvo [Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law]. 2020, V. 13, I. 2, pp. 6–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-2-1. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MNPUER
5. Zueva N.L. Tsifrovizatsiya sotsial’noi sfery. [Digitalization of the Social Sphere]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law]. 2022, I. 2 (49), pp. 277–287. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17308/law/1995-5502/2022/2/277-287. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NXIEHH
6. Ivanov D.Yu., Volkov V.A. Politicheskie aspekty tsifrovizatsii i setevizatsii gosudarstva. [Political Aspects of Digitalization and Networkization of the State]. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie [Administrative Consulting]. 2023, I. 10 (178), pp. 19–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-10-19-32. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LPHEWO
7. Kabanov Yu.A., Sanina A.G., Styrin E.M. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya gosudarstva i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo v kross-natsional’noi perspektive. [Digital Transformation of the State and Socio-Economic Inequality in a Cross-National Perspective]. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies]. 2024, V. 22, I. 2, pp. 195–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2024-22-2-195-208. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BKFCQS
8. Kon’kov A.E. Tsifrovizatsiya politiki vs politika tsifrovizatsii. [Digitalization of Politics vs. the Politics of Digitalization]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations]. 2020, V. 13, I. 1, pp. 47–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.104. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DOKOFB
9. Smorgunov L.V. Tsifrovizatsiya i setevaya effektivnost’ gosudarstvennoi upravlyaemosti. [Digitalization and Network Efficiency of State Governability]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science]. 2021, I. 3, pp. 13–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.03.01. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KHMUCH
10. Stroev V.V., Sidorenko S.V. Analiz tsifrovoi zrelosti regionov Rossiiskoi Federatsii. [Analysis of Digital Maturity of the Regions of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik universiteta [University Bulletin]. 2024, I. 5, pp. 5–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-5-5-14. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ATSTIE
11. Kholodenko Yu.A. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: vozmozhnosti i riski. [Digital Transformation of Public Administration: Opportunities and Risks]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2022, V. 28, I. 3, pp. 28–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2022-28-3-43-78. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TLNZWL
12. Shogenov M.Z., Guppoev T.B. Nezavisimaya otsenka kachestva sotsial’nykh uslug v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. [Independent Assessment of the Quality of Social Services in the Context of Digitalization of Public Administration]. Proryvnoe razvitie ekonomiki Rossii: usloviya, instrumenty, effekty. [Breakthrough Development of the Russian Economy: Conditions, Instruments, Effects]. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2018, pp. 280–288. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YTIIPJ
13. Hanelt A., Bohnsack R., Marz D., Antunes Marante C. A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies. 2020, Vol. 58, I. 5, pp. 1159–1197. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XWOGSK
14. Mergel I., Edelmann N., Haug N. Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly. 2019, Vol. 36, I. 4, pp. 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.
15. Peeters R., Widlak A. The Digital Cage: Administrative Exclusion through Information Architecture – The Case of the Dutch Civil Registry’s Master Data Management System. Government Information Quarterly. 2018, Vol. 35, I. 2, pp. 175–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.02.003.
