Russian Federation
The article examines criminal-legal features of victimization aspect of domestic violence, presents the analysis of the use in legislation of such terms as “victim” and “injured person”, their legal specifics, reflects debate in criminal law theory about characteristics of victimization aspect. The author provides classification for victims of criminal assault, reveals gaps of the Russian criminal legislation in the sphere of family protection, puts forward proposals for improving the criminal law aimed at harsher punishment for the violation of rights and interests of a family and its members. The author sees a wider scope of persons recognized as victims to be one of the possible ways of improving legal protection of personal interests, accompanied by enshrining relevant public-law mechanisms of protecting rights and interests of “other persons” as victims in the Criminal and Criminal Procedure Codes of Russia. In order to extend the definition of “victim”, the author proposes to differentiate the legal status of the abovementioned category of persons, talking into account the specifics of each of those persons.
Criminal law protection, legislation, crime, victim, family violence.
1. Baril M. La criminologie et la Justice a l’heure de la victime. Revue Internationale de criminologie et de Police technique. 1981. № 4.
2. Anoshchenkova S. V. Ugolovno-pravovoe uchenie o poterpevshem. M., 2006.
3. Bafiya E. Problemy kriminologii: dialektika kriminogennoy situatsii. M., 1983.
4. Bozh´ev V. P. Usloviya dopuska poterpevshego k uchastiyu v predvaritel´nom sledstvii. Predvaritel´noe sledstvie v usloviyakh pravovoy reformy / pod red. B. C. Shadrina. Volgograd, 1991.
5. Budyakova T. P. Poterpevshiy: ugolovno-pravovoy, ugolovno-protsessual´nyy i viktimologicheskiy analiz ponyatiya. Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 3.
6. Bulgakov D. B. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave i ego kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol´, 2000.
7. Vagin O. A., Ovchinskiy V. S., Chechetin A. E. Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossiyskoy Federatsii na strazhe interesov poterpevshikh. URL: http://www.crime.vl.ru/index.php?p=3851&;more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1 (data obrashcheniya: 28.05.2015).
8. Vlasov A. V. Vozmeshchenie vreda zhertvam prestupleniy. Zakonnost´. 2000. № 2.
9. Denisov G. I. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: teoriya i praktika. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 8.
10. Doklad Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2013 g. URL.http://www.rg.ru/2014/04/08/doklad-site-dok.html (data obrashcheniya: 28.05.2015).
11. Zherebyat´ev I. V. Lichnost´ poterpevshego v sovremennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: monografiya. Orenburg, 2004.
12. Zakonodatel´naya tekhnika / pod red. Yu. A. Tikhomirova. M., 2000.
13. Zashchita prav poterpevshego v ugolovnom protsesse: sravnitel´noe issledovanie. M., 1993.
14. Kvashis V. E. Osnovy viktimologii. Problemy zashchity prav poterpevshikh ot prestupleniy. M., 1999.
15. Kovler A. I. Pravovye pozitsii Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka (v svete postanovleniy, prinyatykh v 2010 godu po zhalobam protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii). Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2011. № 2.
16. Korzhanskiy N. I. Predmet prestupleniya: ucheb. posobie. Volgograd, 1976.
17. Krasikov A. N. Sushchnost´ i znachenie soglasiya poterpevshego v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Saratov, 1976.
18. Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. N. F. Kuznetsovoy, V. V. Luneeva. M., 2004.
19. Lopashenko N. A. Nesovershennoletniy kak poterpevshiy i sub´´ekt v prestupnykh posyagatel´stvakh. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn´. 2001. № 1.
20. Mazur N. V. Osnovaniya vozniknoveniya professional´nogo predstavitel´stva poterpevshego v ugolovnom protsesse. Problemy primeneniya novogo ugolovno-protsessual´nogo zakonodatel´stva v dosudebnom proizvodstve: mater. nauch.-prakt. konf. Ch. 2. Barnaul, 2002.
21. Moysyuk O. M. Viktimologichna profilaktika porushen´ bezpeki dorozhnogo rukhu (st. 215 KK Ukraїni): avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Kiїv, 1999.
22. Nevalinnyy M. Opredelenie ponyatiya sem´i i chlenov sem´i poterpevshego. Pravo Ukrainy. 1996. № 8.
23. Polubinskiy V. I. Fundamental´nye i prikladnye nachala kriminal´noy viktimologii: monografiya. M, 2010.
24. Rivman D. V. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie lichnosti i povedeniya poterpevshego ot prestupleniya. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya bor´by s prestupnost´yu. Irkutsk, 1985.
25. Rivman D. V., Ustinov B. C. Viktimologiya. SPb., 2000.
26. Senatorov N. V. Poterpevshiy ot prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Khar´kov, 2005.
27. Sidorov B. V. Povedenie poterpevshikh ot prestupleniya i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost´: avtoref. dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1998.
28. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. T. 1. M., 1970.
29. Sumachev A. V. Postradavshiy kak sub´´ekt ugolovnogo pravootnosheniya: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan´, 1997.
30. Tagantsev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lektsii. Chast´ obshchaya: v 2 t. T. 2. M., 1994.
31. Tikhomirov Yu. A. O pravilakh zakonodatel´noy tekhniki. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1999. № 11.
32. Tyurin D. P. Rassmotrenie problemy viktimologii po materialam issledovaniy, provodimykh v Kanade. Nauchnaya informatsiya po voprosam bor´by s prestupnost´yu. M., 1985. № 86.
33. Fargiev I. A. Uchenie o poterpevshem v ugolovnomprave Rossii: avtoref. dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005.
34. Frank L. V. Poterpevshie ot prestupleniya i problemy sovetskoy viktimologii. Dushanbe, 1977.
35. Kharlamov V. S. Otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt protivodeystviya kriminal´nomu nasiliyu v sem´e. SPb., 2014.
36. Khristenko V. E. Psikhologiya povedeniya zhertvy. Rostov n/D, 2004.
37. Shikula I. R. Poterpevshiy ot nasil´stvennykh prestupleniy: ugolovno-pravovye i viktimologicheskie aspekty: monografiya. M., 2010.
38. Shugrina E. S. Tekhnika yuridicheskogo pis´ma. M., 2001.
39. Yani P. S. Zakonodatel´noe opredelenie poterpevshego ot prestupleniya. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 4.
