Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the study of the persuasive potential of statements with futurum I forms in the context of the implementation of persuasive strategy in political discourse. Persuasivity is a fundamental characteristic of political discourse and in pragmalinguistic studies it is studied in the context of the implementation of persuasive strategy. Among the means of verbalization of persuasive strategy, a special place is occupied by futurum I forms, which, due to the combination of temporal and modal properties, can express the addresser’s intention to induce the addressee to perform certain actions or convince him of the need to implement them, which is the essence of persuasive strategy. The empirical material of the study shows that statements with futurum I forms are indirect speech acts, the illocutionary force of which lies in the appeal, incentive, assurance, promise, forecasting. Taking into account pragmatic factors and contextual features of the communication flow allows us to discover and describe the illocutionary force of these speech acts, as well as to justify the choice of statements with futurum I to provide maximum impact. Identifying the pragmatic potential of statements with futurum I forms will allow us to penetrate deeper into the nature of speech influence and develop effective methods of persuasion, as well as tools to counteract speech manipulation.
futurum I, speech impact, persuasive strategy, speech act, illocutionary force, persuasion, political discourse
1. Averina A.V. Vidy modal'nyh znacheniy v nemeckom yazyke, peredavaemyh formoy Futur I [Tekst] / A.V. Averina // Russkaya germanistika: Ezhegodnik Rossiyskogo soyuza germanistov. — 2021. — T. 18. — S. 284–303. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SEPPXX
2. Averina A.V. Mezhkategorial'naya vzaimosvyaz' temporal'nyh i modal'nyh znacheniy v sisteme vyrazheniya buduschego vremeni v nemeckom i russkom yazykah [Tekst] / A.V. Averina // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika. — 2021. № 3. — S. 69–78. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2021-3-69-78 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RYHDUA
3. Akopova D.R. Strategii i taktiki politicheskogo diskursa [Tekst] / D.R. Akopova // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. — 2013. — № 6-1. S. 403–409. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RUQMGD
4. Baranov A.N. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoriya i praktika [Tekst] / A.N. Baranov. — M.: Flinta : Nauka, 2007. — 592 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PWFJSF
5. Blakar R.M. Yazyk kak instrument social'noy vlasti [Tekst] / R.M. Blakar // Yazyk i modelirovanie social'nogo vzaimodeystviya: Sbornik statey. — M.: Progress, 1987. S. 88–125.
6. Bodnaruk E.V. Klassifikaciya rechevyh aktov s futural'noy semantikoy (na materiale nemeckogo yazyka) [Tekst] / E.V. Bodnaruk // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 9. Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 62–75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UGCHVN
7. Bodnaruk E.V. Buduschee vremya i sredstva ego eksplikacii v nemeckom yazyke [Tekst] / E.V. Bodnaruk // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. 2018. — № 53. — S. 32–47. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/53/3 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YKKXYL
8. Bylina E.E. Analiz konstrukciy dlya vyrazheniya obeschaniya v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [Tekst] / E.E. Bylina // Filologiya, lingvistika i lingvodidaktika v sovremennom obschestve: Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii. — Elec: Eleckiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. I.A. Bunina, 2024. — S. 64–69. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EOIPBF
9. Vodak R. Yazyk. Diskurs. Politika [Tekst] / R. Vodak. Volgograd: Peremena, 1997. — 139 s.
10. Voronina L.V. Kognitivnye mehanizmy persuazivnosti politicheskogo diskursa [Tekst] / L.V. Voronina // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya. — 2023. — T. 15. — № 1. — S. 17–27. — DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2023-1-17-27 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CQVWJT
11. Golodnov A.V. Persuazivnost' kak universal'naya strategiya tekstoobrazovaniya v ritoricheskom metadiskurse (na materiale nemeckogo yazyka) [Tekst]: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.04 / A.V. Golodnov. — SPb., 2011. 42 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZOJIWL
12. Gocheva I.V. Konceptual'nyy analiz pobuzhdeniya (na materiale russkogo i angliyskogo yazykov) [Tekst] / I.V. Gocheva // Neofilologiya. — 2021. — T. 7. — № 26. S. 264–269. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-264-269 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DCRRWL
13. Guseva O.A. Usloviya realizacii strategii emocional'nogo rezonansa v politicheskom manipulyativnom diskurse [Tekst] / O.A. Guseva // Lingua Mobilis. — 2009. — № 5. — S. 118–129. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MSXZMT
14. Dem'yankov V.Z. Interpretaciya politicheskogo diskursa v SMI [Tekst] / V.Z. Dem'yankov // Yazyk SMI kak ob'ekt mezhdisciplinarnogo issledovaniya: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Izd-vo MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2003. — S. 116–133. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SCEGEZ
15. Zharina O.A. Suggestivnaya strategiya modelirovaniya hronotopa v politicheskom diskurse sovremennogo zarubezhnogo mediaprostranstva [Tekst] / O.A. Zharina, A.A. Dmitrova // Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal. — 2019. T. 8. — № 4. — S. 227–231. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.26140/bgz3-20190804-0050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26140/bgz3-2019-0804-0050; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZHRIQX
16. Matveeva G.G. Dva napravleniya v sovremennoy pragmalingvistike [Tekst] / G.G. Matveeva, I.V. Samarina, L.N. Seliverstova // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psihologiya. Sociologiya. Pedagogika. — 2009. — № 1-2. — S. 50–57. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KVPYFJ
17. Mihaleva O.L. Politicheskiy diskurs: specifika manipulyativnogo vozdeystviya [Tekst] / O.L. Mihaleva. — M.: LIBROKOM, 2009. — 256 s.
18. Nasyrova E.A. Sootnoshenie semanticheskih priznakov modal'nosti i temporal'nosti v forme nemeckogo futuruma [Tekst] / E.A. Nasyrova // Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. — 2013. — T. 18. — № 2. — S. 476–482. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QIUMCL
19. Poluykova S.Yu. Persuazivnye strategii v sovremennom prosvetitel'skom diskurse [Tekst] / S.Yu. Poluykova // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya. — 2010. — № 4. — S. 63–67. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MSYYLP
20. Ruzhenceva N.B. Diskreditiruyuschie taktiki i priemy v rossiyskom politicheskom diskurse [Tekst] / N.B. Ruzhenceva. — Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo gos. ped. un-ta, 2004. — 294 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QCNXAZ
21. Ryukova A.R. Yazykovye sposoby realizacii persuazivnosti [Tekst] / A.R. Ryukova, E.A. Filimonova // Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. — 2016. — T. 21. — № 2. S. 431–435. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WKVDML
22. Smirnova T.Yu. Grammaticheskie edinicy v pragmaticheskom fokuse publichnyh vystupleniy politikov [Tekst] / T.Yu. Smirnova // Nemeckaya filologiya v Sankt-Peterburgskom gosudarstvennom universitete: Tipologiya rechevyh zhanrov. Vypusk VIII. — SPb.: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gos. un-ta, 2019. — S. 68–79. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LRXDOE
23. Stepanova N.V. Persuazivnost' vs evazivnost': strategii v sovremennom politicheskom interv'yu [Tekst] / N.V. Stepanova // Diskurs. — 2019. — T. 5. — № 3. — S. 79–89. — DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-3-79-89 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LEBKCB
24. Chernyavskaya V.E. Diskurs vlasti i vlast' diskursa. Problemy rechevogo vozdeystviya [Tekst] / V.E. Chernyavskaya. — M.: Flinta, 2006. — 136 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RWLPMR
25. Chernyavskaya V.E. Programma politicheskoy partii kak persuazivnyy tekst [Tekst] / V.E. Chernyavskaya, I.Yu. Loginova // Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena. — 2005. — T. 5. № 11. — S. 64–75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KVRQKP
26. Chudinov A.P. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Tekst] / A.P. Chudinov. — M.: Flinta, 2008. — 254 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QTPHNJ
27. Sheygal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Tekst] / E.I. Sheygal. — M.: Gnozis, 2004. — 324 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QODCTF
28. Borst T. Sprachpragmatische Überlegungen zur Funktion und zum Typus parlamentarischer Redehandlungen. In: Die Praxis in der Präsentation. Sozialwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1999, pp. 21–38. URL: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-322-81261-2_3
29. Kamps K. Kommunikationsmanagement und Regierungs-PR. In: Korte, KR., Florack, M. (eds) Handbuch Regierungsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2022, pp. 521–530. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30071-5_49
30. Lenerz J. Werden und das deutsche Futur. In: Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1997, pp. 399–412.
31. Meyer T. Die Theatralität der Politik in der Mediendemokratie. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.bpb.de/shop/zeitschriften/apuz/27196/die-theatralitaet-der-politik-in-der-mediendemokratie (data obrascheniya: 17.06.2025).
32. Palasic N. Persuasive Strategien und Sprachelemente im politischen Wahlkampf in Österreich. Dissertation. Universität Wien, 2014, pp. 48–49.
33. Steube A. Temporale Bedeutung im Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1980. 219 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112709757
